The Effect of Borderline Pulmonary Hypertension on Survival in Chronic Lung Disease.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the new "borderline" hemodynamic class for pulmonary hypertension (PH) (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP], 21-24 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance, [PVR], ≥3 wood units, [WU]) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of borderline PH (BLPH) on survival in COPD and ILD patients. METHOD: Survival was analyzed from retrospective data from 317 patients in 12 centers (Italy, Spain, UK) comparing four hemodynamic groups: the absence of PH (NoPH; mPAP <21 mm Hg or 21-24 mm Hg and PVR <3 WU), BLPH (mPAP 21-24 mm Hg and PVR ≥3 WU), mild-moderate PH (MPH; mPAP 25-35 mm Hg and cardiac index [CI] ≥2 L/min/m2), and severe PH (SPH; mPAP ≥35 mm Hg or mPAP ≥25 mm Hg and CI <2 L/min/m2). RESULTS: BLPH affected 14% of patients; hemodynamic severity did not predict survival when COPD and ILD patients were analyzed together. However, survival in the ILD cohort for any PH level was worse than in NoPH (3-year survival: NoPH 58%, BLPH 32%, MPH 28%, SPH 33%, p = 0.002). In the COPD cohort, only SPH had reduced survival compared to the other groups (3-year survival: NoPH 82%, BLPH 86%, MPH 87%, SPH 57%, p = 0.005). The mortality risk correlated significantly with mPAP in ILD (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.776, 95% CI: 2.057-3.748, p < 0.001) and notably less in COPD patients (HR: 1.015, 95% CI: 1.003-1.027, p = 0.0146). CONCLUSIONS: In ILD, any level of PH portends worse survival, while in COPD, only SPH presents a worse outcome.

Long-Term Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation on Diaphragm in Chronic Respiratory Failure.

PURPOSE: Home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is recommended in patients with COPD and hypercapnic chronic respiratory failure (HCRF). The mechanism by it can improve alveolar ventilation during spontaneous breathing is not yet completely explained. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of on diaphragm muscle function in a series of patients with HCRF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, longitudinal, prospective study of a series of patients with very severe chronic obstruction to airflow treated with home high imntensity NIV (HINIV). Patients underwent a baseline and after 12 months assessment including adherence to treatment, quality of life, respiratory function tests and diaphragmatic ultrasound. SPSS v.26 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We studied 30 patients, 63% male, the mean age was 60.8 (±6.4) years old. Patients had a severe obstructive ventilatory pattern [FEV1 21.8 (±6.1)%] and hypercapnia [pCO2 56.4 (±7.2) mmHg]. After 12 months of HINIV, we observed significant increases in FVC of 9.2% (p = 0.002), FEV1 of 3.5% (p = 0.04), MIP of 9.4% (p = 0.006), and 6-minute-walking test (6MWT) of 31.9 m (p = 0.001), as well as decreases in paCO2 of 12.5 mmHg (p = 0.001), HCO3 of 4.7 mmol/L (p = 0.001) and BODE index from 7 to 6. Diaphragmatic ultrasound demonstrated an increase in the thickening fraction of 14% (p = 0.002). Respiratory symptoms (p = 0.04), physical function (p = 0.03), and sleep (p = 0.04) also improved. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCRF due to very severe chronic obstruction to airflow, long-term HINIV can improve respiratory performance by improving the function of the diaphragmatic musculature. Larger multicenter clinical trials are needed to confirm the results suggested in this study.

Influence of Cytomegalovirus on the Survival of Cytomegalovirus-Seropositive Lung Transplant.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to analyze the survival of patients undergoing lung transplant (LT) with cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive serologies at the time of transplantation, according to the presence of CMV events and according to the severity of these events. The secondary objective was to assess whether there are differences in the incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) according to the presence of these events. METHODS: This was an observational, single-center, retrospective study. The inclusion criterion for the study was having undergone LT at the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre from October 2008 to February 2019. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The incidence of CLAD was compared using the χ2 test. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 239 LTs. In terms of survival, no difference was found between patients with and without CMV events (log-rank P = .52), with mean survival of 3223 ± 164 days and 3024 ± 146 days, respectively. Nor did we find a difference when stratifying patients according to no CMV events, infection, syndrome, and disease (log-rank P = .6). There was also no difference in the incidence of CLAD between patients with and without CMV events (P > .178). CONCLUSION: In patients with positive CMV serology, the development of CMV events, including severe disease, does not seem to influence survival. The incidence of CLAD also is not increased by the presence of CMV events.

Antithymocyte Globulin Treatment for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Lung Transplant Recipients: Experience From a National Reference Transplant Center.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of mortality after the first year of transplantation and treatments can have little impact on CLAD progression in some cases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in lung transplant recipients with CLAD. METHODS: We reviewed all patients from our center that had undergone a lung transplant between 2008 and 2019 and selected those with CLAD who were treated with ATG. The closest lung function (forced expiratory volume in the first second) to the ATG administration was recorded, as well as the values 3, 6, and 12 months before and after treatment. We followed and recorded survival during the 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients with CLAD received ATG treatment. A favorable positive response to treatment (improvement or stabilization on lung function) was achieved in half of the patients. Most patients (71%) who responded well to ATG were in CLAD stage 1 to 2. The fall slope of forced expiratory volume in the first second is better after treatment. The median survival was 27 months, and we found a trend toward better survival in early CLAD stages 1 to 2. There were also differences in survival between rapid decliners and nonrapid decliners. CONCLUSIONS: ATG treatment could play a role in patient with CLAD who do not respond to conventional therapies. The effect of cytolytic therapy with ATG is clearly better in those patients in early stages, with little effect in those in CLAD stage 3.

Morbidity and mortality of serious gastrointestinal complications after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal complications after lung transplatation are associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. This study aims to describe severe gastrointestinal complications (SGC) after lung transplantation. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study that included 136 lung transplant patients during a seven year period in a tertiary care universitary hospital. SGC were defined as any diagnosis related to the gastrointestinal or biliary tract leading to lower survival rates or an invasive therapeutic procedure. Early and late complications were defined as those occurring < 30 days and ≥ 30 days post-transplant. The survival function was calculated through the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 17 (12.5%) SGC in 17 patients. Five were defined as early. Twelve patients (70.6%) required surgical treatment. Mortality was 52.9% (n = 9). Patients with SGC had a lower overall survival rate compared to those who did not (14 vs 28 months, p = 0.0099). The development of arrhythmias in the first 48 h of transplantation was a risk factor for gastrointestinal complications (p = 0.0326). CONCLUSIONS: SGC are common after lung transplantation and are associated with a considerable increase in morbidity-mortality. Early recognition is necessary to avoid delays in treatment, since a clear predictor has not been found in order to forecast this relevant comorbidity.

Soporte circulatorio con oxigenador extracorpóreo de membrana durante el embarazo en la enfermedad venooclusiva pulmonar / Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support during pregnancy in pulmonary veno-occlusive disease

No disponible

Experience with leflunomide as treatment and as secondary prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in lung transplant recipients: A case series and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Data concerning the use of leflunomide-a drug approved for rheumatoid arthritis with in vitro anticytomegalovirus (CMV) activity-in lung transplant (LT) recipients are scarce. AIMS: To report the use of leflunomide in LT recipients diagnosed with CMV infection/disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study including LT recipients who received leflunomide for CMV infection or as secondary prophylaxis after viremia clearance. We also conducted a full systematic PubMed search until June 30, 2017. RESULTS: We identified 5 LT recipients in our center plus 7 patients reported in the literature. All patients had previously received ganciclovir (GCV) and foscarnet (FOS), with drug-induced adverse effects described in 6 recipients (50%). Antiviral resistance mutations were observed in 8 patients (66.7%). Leflunomide was prescribed for CMV infection in 9 of 12 patients (75%) and as secondary prophylaxis in 3 patients (25%). Initial decrease of CMV viremia after starting leflunomide was observed in 7 of 9 recipients (77.7%), although this response was only transient in 2 patients. Long-term suppression of CMV viremia was reported in 7 of 12 patients (58.3%). In 3 recipients (25%), leflunomide was discontinued due to adverse effects. DISCUSSION: Our study has some limitations, such as the small number of patients included, its retrospective nature, and absence of leflunomide drug monitoring in serum. Notwithstanding, in our experience, leflunomide proved to be particularly effective as an anti-CMV secondary prophylaxis treatment and for clearing low-grade viremia. Moreover, leflunomide combined with a short course of GCV or intravitreal FOS also proved to be very effective in some patients. CONCLUSION: Leflunomide, alone or in combination, could be an effective treatment in selected LT recipients with GCV-resistant CMV infection and as secondary prophylaxis. Further studies are necessary.